Journalist Nathan Schneider, author of Thank You, Anarchy: Notes from the Occupy Apocalypse, explains the different models of the sharing economy. Silicon Valley innovation and the loss of…
Socialism is a religion.
COSTS are always individual. Whoever incurs the cost is the owner.
The question of ownership, that is, the question of organization or
“control” of assets in the economy has thus already been settled by costs
incurers
Costs are UNEQUAL, why should property be equally distributed?
Equal property for Unequal cost?
Equal pay for unequal work?
you commies are born oxymorons
to organize the “ECONOMY”?
You mean to organize OWNER’S property! How about society reorganizes your
face?
It’s no man’s business to “organize the ECONOMY”
Man’s business is to protect private property from “organizers of
economy”(aka THIEVES)
Armando7654 says
Socialism is a religion.
COSTS are always individual. Whoever incurs the cost is the owner.
The question of ownership, that is, the question of organization or
“control” of assets in the economy has thus already been settled by costs
incurers
AnxiousObserver says
Libertarian paradise!
Armando7654 says
Costs are UNEQUAL, why should property be equally distributed?
Equal property for Unequal cost?
Equal pay for unequal work?
you commies are born oxymorons
Armando7654 says
to organize the “ECONOMY”?
You mean to organize OWNER’S property! How about society reorganizes your
face?
It’s no man’s business to “organize the ECONOMY”
Man’s business is to protect private property from “organizers of
economy”(aka THIEVES)
Armando7654 says
costs are not shared
why should property be?
if you didn’t share the costs, who are you to “share” property of another
man’s labor?